One Law for them another for us.. Justice for Ian Tomlinson..

G20 police sergeant cleared of baton charge

Delroy Smellie ruled to have acted lawfully when striking G20 protester Nicola Fisher on legs during Ian Tomlinson vigil

Sergeant Delroy Smellie leaves court after being cleared of assaulting G20 protester Nicola Fisher
Police Sergeant Delroy Smellie (3rd right) leaves court after being found not guilty of assaulting G20 protester Nicola Fisher.

A Metropolitan police sergeant who was filmed hitting a woman with a baton at the G20 demonstrations walked free from court today after a judge ruled he acted lawfully.

Delroy Smellie, who was standing in the dock for the verdict, smiled widely and gave two thumbs up to his supporters as he was cleared.

Nodding to the judge, he said: “Thank you very much.” Smellie then hugged his brother and left the courtroom, joking and laughing with lawyers.

The 47-year-old sergeant refused to talk to reporters, saying: “I don’t think so, I’ve got a reputation to protect.”

Smellie was suspended last year after video footage was posted on the YouTube website showing him back-handing a protester and striking her twice on the legs with his metal baton.

He was acquitted of assault by beating after a four-day trial in which his alleged victim, protester Nicola Fisher, declined to give evidence.

The judgment is a major setback for the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), which received almost 300 complaints about police behaviour at the G20 protests. Figures released last week revealed that despite numerous IPCC investigations no officer has faced serious disciplinary action and none have been successfully prosecuted.

The district judge, Daphne Wickham, said there was no evidence that his use of the baton was not approved, correct or measured, adding that Smellie had a “mere seven seconds” to act, and other witnesses had feared for his safety.

She said: “It was for the prosecution to prove this defendant was not acting in lawful self-defence. I have found the prosecution has failed in this respect and the defendant has raised the issue of lawful self-defence and as such is entitled to be acquitted.”

Wickham, who heard the case without a jury, watched video footage of the incident and looked at dozens of photographs. Nicholas Paul, of the Crown Prosecution Service, said Smellie lost his self-control because of Fisher’s irritating, aggressive and confrontational actions.

He said the officer was justified when he shouted at her, pushed her back and struck her with the back of his hand, knocking off her sunglasses. But Paul said the officer went too far when he struck Fisher across the thigh with the extendable metal weapon, known as an asp.

The clash attracted worldwide attention when amateur footage of it was posted on YouTube. Fisher, of Brighton, suffered two bruises to her leg and enlisted the publicist Max Clifford to sell her story to a national newspaper for around £26,000. She failed to attend the trial, claiming she was depressed and did not want to be in the public spotlight again.

Clifford said she would be disappointed but not surprised by the outcome.

“He is a police officer, she’s a protester so she’s obviously very disappointed,” Clifford said. “She sees it as a total miscarriage of justice. She was convinced that she wouldn’t get justice.”

Smellie, from the Met’s territorial support group (TSG), a specialist public order unit, argued during his trial that he believed Fisher posed a threat to himself and fellow officers. He said he repeatedly struck Fisher, who was considerably smaller than him, after mistaking a carton of orange juice and digital camera she was carrying for weapons.

The incident took place on 2 April at a memorial vigil for Ian Tomlinson, the newspaper vendor who had died the previous day after being attacked by another officer, also from the TSG.

Defending the force he used against Fisher, Smellie, who is originally from Bolton, suggested widely publicised video footage and photographs of the incident did not convey the threat he felt she posed.

“Not one photograph or piece of footage comes close to reflecting the fear as I turned around to see this crowd and its proximity, both to myself and my officers,” he told the court. “At the time I thought, this is it. She is deliberately coming from a blind spot. The reason she is coming from a blind spot is to hide her intention so she can approach and attack her target – me.”

Bystanders told the court they had seen Fisher acting in an aggressive and erratic way, waving her arms and screaming at police. One officer said she “looked like trouble” from the outset, and was seeking to provoke police.

After Fisher repeatedly pushed toward the police line, Smellie struck. The prosecution said footage of the incident formed the “core” of its case. The video showed Smellie initially strike Fisher with the back of his hand in what the prosecution accepted was a legal “clearance-swipe”.

When Fisher again returned, shouting “you hit a fucking woman”, the sergeant took out his baton and hit her twice on the legs. These final two blows were what the prosecution claimed were unlawful.

In his defence, Smellie said he back-handed Fisher because another tactic could have seriously injured her. Talking about the back-handed strike, he said: “Does it really need a broken jaw, which could easily have happened if I struck her with my left elbow in her face? I thought that the most reasonable level of force would be a flick with the hand as a distraction clearance.”

Smellie said that he chose to strike her legs with a baton – rather than her arm – for a similar reason. “The force of the strike, the differential in size – I could easily have snapped that arm.”

He said that, after striking her: “I hoped that she would either fall to the ground, drop the weapons or go away and get back, either one of those things she had been asked to do on many occasions. But certainly to ensure that she was not able to use those weapons or that the weapons were not able to be used.”

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

2 responses to “One Law for them another for us.. Justice for Ian Tomlinson..

  1. C Raitt

    What was the prosecutor doing. I watched the film, Mr Smellie steps back draws and extends his baton then steps forward and strikes. He wasn’t attacked at this point and an officer on either side had also turned round.
    If positions were reversed Miss Fisher wouldn’t have got off.
    The judge seems unfair to me. Remember Rodney King, his attackers got off first time round and were only convicted after a big riot. Los Angeles Mayor Tom Bradley said, “the jury’s verdict will not blind us to what we saw on that videotape. The men who beat Rodney King do not deserve to wear the uniform of the L.A.P.D. Seems the MET has lower standards cause Mr Smellie is back on duty.

  2. Peter Reynolds

    http://peterreynolds.wordpress.com/2010/03/31/smellie-not-guilty-verdict-stinks/

    This is an outrage. There is no such thing as British justice anymore.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s