(urban exploration what is this about?)

Writing for the {Blueprint} architectural journal , Mark Chalmers offered one of the best researched pieces about the UK’s urban exploration scene and gave the activity some of the recognition it deserves (especially in light of the awful press generated recently)and eliments of the far right this is the core action of underclass rising along with a little bit more see our blogfor more updates:

Despite their status as outsiders, urban explorers have much more in common with architects and property developers than they might think, says Mark ChalmersIt is often thought that urban exploration began in Britain in the mid-Nineties with Jack and Megan of the Milk Crate Gang, who investigated the abandoned tunnels of Glasgow’s Low Level railway system. Of course, the Milk Crate Gang were among the first to upload photos of their ‘explores’ on to a website and, in doing so, built a worldwide audience. Their downfall was a sensationalist newspaper article, which effectively put them out of business. In more recent years, the urban exploration (UE) community has grown around web forums such as {28dayslater} in Britain, and UER in Canada.

The term {‘urbanexploration’} is a recent one, but the urge to explore buildings that have fallen into disrepair is long-standing. John Harris in his book {No Voice From The Hall}, recounted his explorations of abandoned country housed during the years following the Second World War and noted that the key to exploration is serendipity as much as curiosity. You have to be luck to get in to some abandoned sites, not just persistent.

The pattern of exploration has developed over time – and the fact that exploration should become an urban rather than rural phenomenon reflects social change. Harris took advantage of the abandonment of stately homes when punitive death duties were imposed on the owners. Today, the Care In The Community programme in the NHS has released lots of patients into wider society; it has also freed up many asylums for exploration. Likewise, globalisation and the de-industrialisation of Western countries means that many factories now lie derelict.

Yet beyond the adolescent chatter of those who style themselves ‘shadow ninjas’ and get their thrills by transgressing, Urban Exploration serves a real purpose. The more thoughtful explorers record buildings which heritage bodies have chosen not to spend resources on. The aesthetics of derelict buildings have always attracted photographers, who are drawn to capture something of their transience and decay. The archive of images that explorers take has created a vast database and, as a result, have had to become architecturally literate. Unlike architects, developers or nimbies, however, they are not partisan.

They do, however, run risks which were summed up by the architectural writer Reyner Banham in A Concrete Atlantis. To find out more about the grain silos at Buffalo in New York State, Banham explored their derelict shells and nearly came to grief when he crashed through the plywood cover of an open culvert. As he extricated himself, he reflected on his folly: “I remembered the fate of the Chicago architectural photographer Richard Nickel, lying dead in the ruins of the Schiller Theatre for weeks before his body was discovered.” The other appealing aspect of UE is the thrill of reaching places barred to the general public. As Banham adds, “the sense of distance from help and civilisation was exhilarating rather than depressing; the presence of the huge abandoned structure produced a mood more elegiac than otherwise.”

Yet the urban explorer is not a complete outsider. The contrast between the besuited developers of abandoned buildings and the spooks in hoodies who creep through them couldn’t be physically more marked. Yet the urban explorer – following the example set by the Oxygen Thief, Turbozutek and Simon Cornwell – and the property capitalist share a common goal. Neither are architects, but both take an interest in old buildings. Furthermore, both can read buildings analytically, a skill often wholly lacking in non-architects. Most tellingly, both camps are ruled by what economist David Ricardo dubbed the Law of Diminishing Returns.

Ricardo maintained that the economy generally moves towards a standstill. In the free market, opportunities to make easy money are taken first, since simple projects on prime sites ensure large returns. However, once the market progresses, and the uncomplicated propositions have been building out, then you’re left with difficult projects. At this point, the anticipated returns diminish due to increased costs, and the economics of the development move towards the static state where cost equals return. So sometimes an abandoned building is left alone until conditions improve.

Of course, derelict buildings are never completely abandoned. Despite palisade fences, security guards and motion-sensing CCTV cameras, the urban explorers seek them out. Using milk crates as step ladders, they tread lightly, recording these places using digital cameras, then sharing their finds on the web. Recently, explorers have been stymied by the property boom we’ve experienced over the past years, which means that developers have been snapping up their haunts; the corollary of this is that recession is a good thing. Economics binds the urban explorer to the developer as much as it forces them apart.

Leave a comment

Filed under (urban exploration what is this about?), Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s